Such tests do not take into account the possibility that some VPN providers may have inconsistent performance based on the time of day – it is not unlikely that some providers may not have enough network capacity to provide unthrottled VPN service during peak times. Irregular testing frequency: Different providers may be compared at different times, which is a significant issue.Insufficient volume: In most cases the VPN tests are being run manually which substantially limits the number of tests that can be reasonably performed for the review, thus, causing the results to be less accurate.After all, testing VPN speed is quite complicated due to the number of variables.īefore we can solve the problem of providing standardized, verifiable VPN speed testing, let’s review the issues with testing as it is performed today. It’s not surprising that this problem exists. When this is the case, it makes it very difficult for users to meaningfully compare VPN speeds. When different reviewers rely on different methods and testing environments, they get different results. By becoming a widely adopted solution, it will. Universal application and usership: The solution needs to work for a wide range of different VPN providers.It must also provide the means to achieve sufficient data scales for statistically significant results. Reliability and verification: The testing solution needs to work consistently across different providers’ networks, across years of VPN development, and it needs to be able to verify its own results.A lack of transparency can make it difficult to identify mistakes and trust the test results. Transparency: Users, reviewers, and VPN providers all need to understand how VPN speeds are measured. However, there is no solution that sufficiently addresses all of the following concerns: VPN speed testing tools and methods already exist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |